The 10th Man

Sometimes Good Trades Can Take 15 Years

March 31, 2016

I’ve owned GE at a couple of points in my career. The stock has always treated me well.

I was really bearish on it during the financial crisis. Even at $6 a share. I was telling subscribers it was probably going to go to zero. Obviously, it didn’t. But it wasn’t an unreasonable thing to say at the time.

I don’t feel bad about not buying GE at $6 a share.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with this must-read report from Jared Dillian.

All water under the bridge now. GE has pretty much been dead money ever since Immelt took over in 2001. Some people think that is Immelt’s fault. It’s not. GE has been getting some good press lately (including the cover of Businessweek), and the right story is starting to get out.

Jeff Immelt inherited a completely different GE than the GE that exists today. A huge portion of the company’s revenue once came from GE Capital, which was fine until it wasn’t. After the financial crisis, it became clear that GE Capital needed to be spun off or sold.

That was in 2009, but it didn’t happen until six years later.

GE is a 124-year-old company. Things move pretty slowly. I get the sense that the reason it took so long to get rid of GE Capital was because of some pretty toxic internal politics. If your organization takes six years to make a decision like that, you do not have a very nimble organization.

Say what you want about Lehman Brothers, but it was a very nimble organization.

GE is getting more nimble now. I started by reading the terrific Businessweek piece and kept reading a bunch of other stuff. GE is transforming itself into (don’t laugh, it’s serious) a technology company.

GE makes stuff like big turbines and heavy equipment. Just like you can program a computer to control your thermostat, you can program a computer to control a jet engine. This isn’t a trivial task. It’s not as simple as it sounds. GE actually had to write an entire operating system to control its very large devices.

Early on, Jeff Immelt could have outsourced this, but decided instead to do it all in-house, including opening an office in Menlo Park and hiring away software engineers from places like Google.

He accomplished this without all the yelling and the performance reviews and firing 10% of the company every year. The Neutron Jack days are over.

I never write about things like GE, so why are we spending time talking about it?

Because I noticed the chart was showing signs of life, and it was starting to get some buzz on Twitter. I look for positive price action and then research the story, not the other way around.


Here is a 20-year chart of GE:

First, let me say that it’s really hard to measure CEO performance. Just looking at the stock during the CEO’s tenure doesn’t tell the whole story. GE did great under Jack Welch. But arguably, by increasing the company’s dependence on finance, it increased its vulnerability to the crisis.

Late last year, GE got itself an activist investor: Nelson Peltz, who bought $2.5 billion worth of stock, and then agitated to do… nothing! He said the company needed time for Immelt’s strategy to work, the most un-activist possible thing to say. Interestingly, the market agreed, and the stock shot higher.

You have the confluence of a lot of good things here: shareholder activism, a coherent strategy, the backing of shareholders, a great chart. And it’s underowned.

This $5 Trillion Market Is Just Getting Started.

Don’t miss out on the ETF revolution. Get going with The 5 ETF Trading Strategies You Should Know About Before Investing, from Jared Dillian.

Plus, it’s a stock you can sit on, without a lot of volatility.

These are the kinds of opportunities I really like. They don’t come around very often. I like risk. I like buying things like bombed-out emerging market mining companies. But that isn’t suitable for everyone. GE passes the suitability test. And it pays a dividend.

Advanced Topics

One more advanced topic for more sophisticated readers.

GE was once a conglomerate, a bunch of different businesses that may or may not have been correlated with each other. We’ve been moving away from conglomerates and toward pure-play companies, which is what shareholders want. GE is now a pure-play industrial equipment company. Which means that it will probably be more volatile.

GE will have a higher realized volatility over time, and the implied volatility of the options will probably go way up. One way to play this is by buying long-dated call options (otherwise known as LEAPS) on GE instead of the stock itself. It’s a play on both a rising stock price and rising volatility.  Long-term options are most sensitive to changes in implied volatility.

I have always been a believer in Immelt. Patience has been required. Patience will be rewarded.

Though sometimes success can come fast too. Case in point: My latest Street Freak recommendation, an undervalued North American construction supplier with a huge market share, is already up 20.5%. Might be time to give Street Freak a try, so why don’t you?

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian


Get Thought-Provoking Contrarian
Insights from Jared Dillian

Discuss This


We welcome your comments. Please comply with our Community Rules.


Robert Johnson

April 2, 2016, 6:07 a.m.

They waited to sell GEC until they could realize best values
possible for it, didn’t want to sell at bottom knowing central banks
would bubble that stuff up again, the debt-fueled reflation efforts.
(fixed typo so re-Posting)

Use of this content, the Mauldin Economics website, and related sites and applications is provided under the Mauldin Economics Terms & Conditions of Use.

Unauthorized Disclosure Prohibited

The information provided in this publication is private, privileged, and confidential information, licensed for your sole individual use as a subscriber. Mauldin Economics reserves all rights to the content of this publication and related materials. Forwarding, copying, disseminating, or distributing this report in whole or in part, including substantial quotation of any portion the publication or any release of specific investment recommendations, is strictly prohibited.
Participation in such activity is grounds for immediate termination of all subscriptions of registered subscribers deemed to be involved at Mauldin Economics’ sole discretion, may violate the copyright laws of the United States, and may subject the violator to legal prosecution. Mauldin Economics reserves the right to monitor the use of this publication without disclosure by any electronic means it deems necessary and may change those means without notice at any time. If you have received this publication and are not the intended subscriber, please contact


The Mauldin Economics website, Thoughts from the Frontline, The Weekly Profit, The 10th Man, Connecting the Dots, Transformational Technology Digest, Over My Shoulder, Yield Shark, Transformational Technology Alert, Rational Bear, Street Freak, ETF 20/20, In the Money, and Mauldin Economics VIP are published by Mauldin Economics, LLC Information contained in such publications is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The information contained in such publications is not intended to constitute individual investment advice and is not designed to meet your personal financial situation. The opinions expressed in such publications are those of the publisher and are subject to change without notice. The information in such publications may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. You are advised to discuss with your financial advisers your investment options and whether any investment is suitable for your specific needs prior to making any investments.
John Mauldin, Mauldin Economics, LLC and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. Corporate policies are in effect that attempt to avoid potential conflicts of interest and resolve conflicts of interest that do arise in a timely fashion.
Mauldin Economics, LLC reserves the right to cancel any subscription at any time, and if it does so it will promptly refund to the subscriber the amount of the subscription payment previously received relating to the remaining subscription period. Cancellation of a subscription may result from any unauthorized use or reproduction or rebroadcast of any Mauldin Economics publication or website, any infringement or misappropriation of Mauldin Economics, LLC’s proprietary rights, or any other reason determined in the sole discretion of Mauldin Economics, LLC.

Affiliate Notice

Mauldin Economics has affiliate agreements in place that may include fee sharing. If you have a website or newsletter and would like to be considered for inclusion in the Mauldin Economics affiliate program, please go to Likewise, from time to time Mauldin Economics may engage in affiliate programs offered by other companies, though corporate policy firmly dictates that such agreements will have no influence on any product or service recommendations, nor alter the pricing that would otherwise be available in absence of such an agreement. As always, it is important that you do your own due diligence before transacting any business with any firm, for any product or service.

© Copyright 2019 Mauldin Economics